Healing Digital Courtship: Ethics, Psychology, and the Future of Human Connection

Abstract

This white paper examines Bend Dating, a third-generation, clinician-supervised dating application developed in Bend, Oregon. Drawing on research conducted by the Mentor Research Institute (MRI), it situates Bend Dating as an ethical experiment intended to reverse the cultural and psychological harm produced by first- and second-generation dating apps. Earlier generations, driven by profit and gamification, disrupted traditional courtship rituals and fostered behavioral addiction, loneliness, and declining trust. Bend Dating is designed with ethical oversight, local community limits, psychological screening, and transparent governance. The paper argues that technology can be re-engineered to serve relational health rather than corporate profit, and that Bend Dating provides an empirical test of whether ethical algorithms can support human attachment.

Keywords: dating apps, digital ethics, behavioral addiction, courtship, psychology, technology ethics.

Introduction: When Technology Broke Courtship

Over the past three decades, online dating has evolved from cautious curiosity to cultural dependency. The first generation of dating platforms (e.g., Match.com, eHarmony) presented the optimistic promise of scientific matchmaking. The second generation (Tinder, Hinge, Bumble) transformed that promise into gamified entertainment, replacing compatibility with consumption.

According to Mentor Research Institute (2024), these systems “monetized the illusion of intimacy,” prioritizing engagement metrics over emotional health. The result was an ecosystem where users were no longer searching for love but trapped in a loop of dopamine, data, and disappointment. In this sense, corporations broke the culture of dating with technology that became a scam, a behavioral marketplace optimized for addiction.

The Ethical Question Behind Bend Dating

Bend Dating was founded on a simple but radical question:

Can ethical technology help us prevent and heal the damage that has been done, and continues to happen?

Developed by a multidisciplinary team of psychologists, counselors, software engineers, and marriage/divorce attorneys under MRI’s oversight, Bend Dating seeks to restore authenticity to digital relationships. Its guiding hope is to support genuine relationships, while its deepest fear is that the dating public has grown so addicted to gamified validation that it can no longer tolerate authenticity.

From Algorithmic Seduction to Algorithmic Repair

Generation II: Addictive Design

Mentor Research Institute’s (2023) paper The Dating App Mirage identified a neurobehavioral pattern nearly identical to gambling addiction. Apps like Tinder and Hinge exploit intermittent reinforcement through “matches” and paid visibility boosts. Visibility fades over time, creating artificial scarcity; users are then prompted to pay for “roses,” “super likes,” or “boosts.” Each micro-transaction offers a temporary reward and reinforces dependency.

This system, MRI concluded, has turned courtship into a game of stimulus and response, where affection is replaced by algorithmic manipulation. In social-psychological terms, users are not forming relationships, they are participating in variable-reward conditioning.

Generation III: Corrective Design

Bend Dating, by contrast, was engineered to neutralize those addictive design elements.
Key features include:

Local limitation (Bend, Redmond & Sisters, Oregon) to foster real-world accountability.
Identity verification and background checks at no cost to users.
Clinical oversight by licensed mental-health professionals.
Evidence-based personality screening and compatibility metrics.
No swiping, no AI filters, no “friend zones.”
Secure mental-health screening tools and referrals.
Third-party oversight by MRI, ensuring ethical transparency.

With roughly 500 members and an estimated operating cost of US $5.25 per user, Bend Dating operates as a non-profit-aligned social laboratory, an antithesis to billion-dollar engagement engines.

Addiction, Anxiety, and the Illusion of Choice

Second-generation apps created a paradox of abundance: more profiles, less satisfaction. MRI (2024) reported that users experience higher anxiety, reduced self-esteem, and “choice paralysis.” Gen Z and Millennials, in particular, report dating burnout before age 30.

The apps’ algorithmic scarcity loop, offering visibility that fades unless one pays for boosts, has turned digital dating into an economy of manufactured desperation. Mentor Research calls this the commodification of hope. The behavior parallels gambling pathology, where intermittent reinforcement sustains user engagement despite repeated disappointment.

The Enshittification of Digital Dating and Bend Dating’s Response

Technology critic Cory Doctorow coined the term enshittification to describe the predictable life cycle by which online platforms decay as they chase profit. As Doctorow (2023) explains, a digital service typically begins by maximizing value for users, then gradually shifts to extracting value for business customers, and finally degrades both experiences in order to maximize shareholder returns. Dictionary.com (2024) defines the process as “the gradual degradation of an online platform or service’s quality and user experience as it becomes more focused on profit at the expense of users.”

In the realm of online dating, this cycle is unmistakable.

Generation I platforms (eHarmony, Match.com) prioritized helping users form relationships; their revenues depended mainly on subscription access.
Generation II apps (Tinder, Hinge, Bumble) shifted to attention extraction—designing interfaces that reward endless swiping and selling temporary boosts for visibility. As users became habituated and locked-in through social norms and network effects, the platforms began optimizing not for successful matches but for maximum time-on-app.
The result is a textbook case of enshittification: products that once connected people now monetize loneliness through engineered scarcity, gamified “boosts,” and algorithmic throttling of organic reach. In this mature stage, platforms profit precisely when users fail to find lasting connection.

Bend Dating was conceived to break this pattern. Its design inverts every stage of enshittification:

It is non-extractive—operating at a fixed, transparent low cost per member.
It eliminates manipulative engagement loops—there are no boosts, filters, or algorithmic visibility games.
It replaces opaque data-driven monetization with clinician oversight, ethical governance, and evidence-based compatibility tools.
By placing relational outcomes, privacy, and user trust ahead of scale or shareholder gain, Bend Dating represents an anti-enshittified model of digital intimacy, one built to heal rather than exploit.

Bend Dating as a Research and Cultural Intervention

Because Bend Dating operates under MRI’s non-profit oversight, it functions as both product and study. Its research objectives include:

Evaluating whether ethical design reduces compulsive usage.
Measuring relationship readiness and satisfaction outcomes.
Examining whether community-limited platforms can rebuild social trust.

This approach reframes dating technology as therapeutic infrastructure rather than a marketplace. Ethical algorithms, under clinical supervision, can potentially serve as tools for social healing.

Generational Impact and Cultural Repair

MRI’s longitudinal reviews outline the generational consequences of early app design:

Bend Dating’s model aims to counteract these harms through local connection, verified identity, ensuring psychological and physical safety, and clinician-guided awareness and readiness. It asks whether users across generations can relearn courtship once the “game” is removed.

Hope and Fear: A Cultural Crossroads

Our greatest hope is that Bend Dating will support relationships. Our greatest fear is that the dating community is too addicted to their dark personalities and the thrill of the game.

This tension defines the research question: Will people choose genuine intimacy when freed from addictive design?

If they do, it will suggest that digital environments can nurture virtue. If not, it will confirm that the pathology runs deeper, that culture itself has adapted to exploitation.

Conclusion: From Algorithmic Addiction to Algorithmic Empathy

Bend Dating stands as both critique and experiment. It exposes how corporate platforms converted affection into profit, and it tests whether ethical design can reverse that conversion.

Where first-generation apps promised compatibility and second-generation apps monetized loneliness, third-generation models aim to cultivate empathy and accountability.

If corporations broke courtship with technology that became a scam, Bend Dating represents the counter-narrative: technology designed to heal. Its motto,

Whether humanity still prefers love over dopamine is the question Bend Dating dares to ask.

No Games. No Bullshit. No Joke

Functions as both moral declaration and research hypothesis.

References

Anderson, M., Vogels, E. A., & Turner, E. (2020, February 6). The virtues and downsides of online dating. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/06/the-virtues-and-downsides-of-online-dating/

Balki, E. (2025). Are dating app algorithms making men lonely and does this present a public health concern? JMIR Formative Research, 9, e70594. https://formative.jmir.org/2025/4/e70594

Belluck, P. (2025, October 25). Internet reshapes Gen Z sexuality , New research finds. FindArticles (NYTimes Science & Health). https://findarticles.com/internet-reshapes-gen-z-sexuality-new-research-find

Boyle, S. (2024, November 7). Modern dating is broken – and that’s a hidden factor in England’s fertility crisis. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/07/modern-love-dating-apps-fertility

Business of Apps. (2024). Hinge Revenue and Usage Statistics.
https://www.businessofapps.com/data/hinge-statistics

Doctorow, C. (2023, January 20). The enshittification of TikTok. Wired.
https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-platforms-cory-doctorow/

Doctorow, C. (2023, January 23). Tiktok’s enshittification. Pluralistic (blog).
https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/23/potemkin-ai/#tiktokification

Dictionary.com. (2024). Enshittification. Dictionary.com.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/enshittification

Gao, H., Yin, H., Zheng, Z., & Wang, H. (2024). Online dating apps and the association with emotional reactions: A survey on the motivations, compulsive use, and subjective online success of Chinese young adults in online dating. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 18(3), Article 3.
https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/download/35713/32846/65746

Global Dating Insights. (2024, May 10). New Forbes Study Explores Dating App Burnout.
https://www.globaldatinginsights.com/news/new-forbes-study-explores-dating-app-burnout

Gray, A. (2018, October 9). Reading this alone? Recent surveys reveal the curious truth about loneliness. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/10/loneliness-survey-research-findings-bbc-2018

Hall, F. (2024, September 19). The dating-app diversity paradox. The Atlantic.
https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2024/09/dating-app-setup-diversity/679938/

Headspace Inc. (2023). What happens in the brain when we swipe right?
https://www.headspace.com/articles/modern-love-addiction

Hill, F. (2024, August 14). The people who quit dating. The Atlantic.
https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2024/08/single-quitting-dating-relationships/679460/

Match Group. (2025). Second Quarter Results. Investor Relations Report.
https://ir.mtch.com

Mentor Research Institute. (2023). The Dating App Mirage: Illusions of Intimacy in the Digital Marketplace. Bend, OR: Author.
https://www.mentorresearch.org/the-dating-app-mirage

Mentor Research Institute. (2024). Power, Wealth, and Swipe Culture: The Economics of Attraction in U.S. Dating Apps. Bend, OR: Author. https://www.mentorresearch.org/power-wealth-and-swipe-culture

Mentor Research Institute. (2025). Men and Women Disillusioned with Dating Apps in the U.S. and England. Bend, OR: Author.
https://www.mentorresearch.org

Parham, J. (2025, October 22). Tinder launches mandatory facial verification to weed out bots and scammers. WIRED.
https://www.wired.com/story/tinder-launches-mandatory-facial-verification-to-weed-out-bots-and-scammers

Pew Research Center. (2013, October 21). Online dating & relationships. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/

Pew Research Center. (2015, April 20). Teens, technology and romantic relationships. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/10/01/teens-technology-and-romantic-relationships/

Pew Research Center. (2015, February 11). 5 facts about online dating. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2015/02/11/5-facts-about-online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2016, February 29). 5 facts about online dating. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/02/29/5-facts-about-online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2018, May 31). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/

Pew Research Center. (2019, August 20). Share of Americans who have never married is at a record high. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/08/20/share-of-americans-who-have-never-married-is-at-a-record-high/

Pew Research Center. (2019, November 6). Marriage and cohabitation in the U.S. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/11/06/marriage-and-cohabitation-in-the-u-s/

Pew Research Center. (2019, October 30). Share of adults living without a spouse or partner has increased. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/10/30/share-of-adults-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner-has-increased/

Pew Research Center. (2020, August 20). Nearly half of U.S. adults say dating has gotten harder for most people in the last 10 years. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/

Pew Research Center. (2020, August 20). Personal experiences and attitudes of daters. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/personal-experiences-and-attitudes-of-daters/

Pew Research Center. (2020, February 6). 10 facts about Americans and online dating in 2019. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/02/06/10-facts-about-americans-and-online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2020, February 6). Americans’ personal experiences with online dating. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/06/americans-personal-experiences-with-online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2020, May 8). Dating and relationships in the digital age. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/05/08/dating-and-relationships-in-the-digital-age/

Pew Research Center. (2021, November 8). The pandemic stirs up dating, relationships and sex. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/11/08/the-pandemic-stirs-up-dating-relationships-and-sex/

Pew Research Center. (2022, December 12). Most men say it’s harder to date today. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/12/12/most-men-say-its-harder-to-date-today/

Pew Research Center. (2022, February 16). A closer look at Americans who have never married. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/02/16/a-closer-look-at-americans-who-have-never-married/

Pew Research Center. (2023, December 12). The state of marriage and cohabitation in the U.S. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/12/12/the-state-of-marriage-and-cohabitation-in-the-u-s/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). Americans’ views on online dating. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/02/americans-views-on-online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). From looking for love to swiping the field: Online dating in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/02/from-looking-for-love-to-swiping-the-field-online-dating-in-the-u-s/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). Key findings about online dating in the U.S. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/02/key-findings-about-online-dating-in-the-u-s/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). Online dating (topic page). Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/internet-technology/lifestyle-relationships-online/online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). Romance & dating (topic page). Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/family-relationships/romance-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). The experiences of U.S. online daters. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/02/the-experiences-of-u-s-online-daters/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). The who, where and why of online dating in the U.S. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/02/the-who-where-and-why-of-online-dating-in-the-u-s/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). The who, where and why of online dating in the U.S. (PDF report). Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2023/01/PI_2023.02.02_Onilne-Dating_FINAL.pdf

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 2). The who, where, and why of online dating in the U.S.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/02/the-who-where-and-why-of-online-dating-in-the-u-s/

Pew Research Center. (2023, February 24). The never-been-married are biggest users of online dating. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/24/the-never-been-married-are-biggest-users-of-online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2023, January 16). Men, women and social connections. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/01/16/men-women-and-social-connections/

Pew Research Center. (2023, July 17). Dating at 50 and up: Older Americans’ experiences with online dating. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/17/dating-at-50-and-up-older-americans-experiences-with-online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2023, June 26). About half of lesbian, gay and bisexual adults have used online dating. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/26/about-half-of-lesbian-gay-and-bisexual-adults-have-used-online-dating/

Pew Research Center. (2023, September 14). The landscape of relationships in America. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/09/14/the-landscape-of-relationships-in-america/

Pew Research Center. (2025, January 16). Men, women and social connections (updated). Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2025/01/16/men-women-and-social-connections/

Potarca, G. (2020). The demography of swiping right: An overview of couples who met through dating apps in Switzerland. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0243733.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243733

Wang, W. (2025, June 18). Why Americans aren’t getting married and having kids , and how to change that. Institute for Family Studies.
https://ifstudies.org/blog/why-americans-arent-getting-married-and-having-kids-and-how-to-fix-that

World Health Organization. (2021). Social isolation and loneliness among older people: Advocacy brief.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240012037