Mentor Research Institute

Healthy Contracts Legislation; Measurement & Value-Based Payment Contracting; Online Screening & Outcome Measurement Software, The Collapse of Dating and Marriage

503 227-2027

The Quiet Collapse of Courtship, Bonding, Marriage, Family, Community and Reproduction

Are we losing the glue that holds humanity and civilization together?

Summary

This paper presents a sociocultural analysis of contemporary human behavioral decline. drawing on John Calhoun’s Universe 25 mouse experiments. The core argument is that modern societies, particularly in technologically advanced, urbanized contexts, are experiencing a form of “behavioral sink”: a collapse of social, reproductive, and relational vitality despite or because of material abundance in the United States.

The analogy centers on observation that, much like Calhoun’s mouse population which ceased mating, parenting, and social bonding in a utopian enclosure, humans now face:

  • Declining birthrates and courtship behaviors

  • Increasing loneliness and mental health issues

  • Displacement of meaningful roles (e.g., parenting, partnering, providing, protecting, and caregiving)

  • Cultural and behavioral saturation via digital technologies and identity politics

The paper critiques several modern phenomena contributing to this collapse:

  • Social media undermines authentic identity, encouraging performance and self-curation over depth and commitment.

  • AI and digital ecosystems are displacing cognitive effort and behavioral investment, weakening agency and imagination.

  • Extreme radical feminism, in its most ideologically rigid form, is framed as contributing to the rejection of relational interdependence and traditional gender roles, potentially accelerating social disengagement.

  • The Fisherian runaway effect highlights how digital feedback loops exaggerate superficial mating signals at the expense of long-term bonding.

The decline in cooperation, purpose, and reproduction is not framed as a natural correction but as a feedback loop of over-abundance and under-meaning. The paper coins this dual collapse as “death squared”: first behavioral, then biological.

 Table 1: Key Parallels with Universe 25

 

I. The Paradox of Modern Collapse

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, American ethologist John B. Calhoun conducted a series of now-famous behavioral experiments with rodents. Universe 25 was the most ambitious of these: a seemingly perfect enclosure designed to eliminate all traditional survival stressors, ample food and water, ideal temperature, medical care, and protection from predators. Housed in a 9-foot square metal pen with multiple levels and nesting boxes, eight mice were introduced into this utopia, with enough resources to support up to 3,000 individuals. What Calhoun observed, however, was not unbounded flourishing, but a chilling pattern of social and psychological decay.

Table 2: Normal vs. Behavioral Sink Mice Behavior

 

After a period of rapid population growth in Cahoun’s mouse utopia, social behaviors began to deteriorate. Parental care declined. Aggression increased. Mating rituals failed. A class of passive mice, what Calhoun termed the “beautiful ones”, withdrew entirely from interaction, focusing solely on eating, grooming, and sleeping. Despite having every material need met, the colony collapsed. No new generations were born. No social recovery occurred. The population went extinct.

In Universe 25, the population followed a distinct four-phase trajectory of growth and collapse. The population followed a distinct four-phase trajectory of growth and collapse. Following initial adaptation, the mice population entered a rapid growth phase between Days 100 and 315, doubling every 55 days and reaching approximately 600 individuals, well below the enclosure’s 3,000-mouse capacity. However, around Day 315, the growth plateaued, and behavioral degeneration began. Reproduction slowed sharply, and social structures began to deteriorate. By Day 560, mating had effectively ceased. No new litters survived. The population entered a terminal decline, not from lack of space or resources, but from behavioral dysfunction: mothers neglected or attacked offspring, males withdrew from mating and territorial defense, and a class of isolates, the “beautiful ones”, emerged, showing no interest in social interaction or reproduction. Although food, shelter, and protection were abundant, the colony collapsed entirely by around Day 920. No recovery occurred. Calhoun described this as “death squared”, first the behavioral extinction, then the biological. The decline was not a product of scarcity but of abundance stripped of meaning, purpose, and social role engagement.

Calhoun’s Universe 25 study uncovered a psychological truth that transcends rodents: when material needs are met while social and behavioral demands are eliminated, populations may collapse not from scarcity but from loss of purpose. This “death squared”, first behavioral, then biological, presents a warning. In the 21st century, humans  enacting similar dynamics: rapidly evolving social technologies, declining birth rates, and collapse of traditional mating and role structures. This paper explores how digital ecosystems, cultural fragmentation, identity politics, and AI collectively function as behavioral saturation mechanisms, drawing direct parallels to the breakdown observed in Universe 25.

We argue that human ecological viability, particularly in dense, technologically advanced urban centers, is now jeopardized by an artificial abundance that replaces natural role formation and behavioral struggle with simulated gratification. Across genders, generational cohorts, and sexual identities, humans increasingly inhabit a conceptual space devoid of friction, generative struggle, and of durable interdependence. The collapse is not merely social, it is existential.

II. Behavioral Ecology and the Decline of Cooperation

Table 3: Normal vs. Behavioral Sink Mice Behavior

 

Calhoun’s mice were not overwhelmed by scarcity. Instead, they were overwhelmed by abundance without structure. Universe 25 was designed as a rodent utopia: limitless food, clean water, no predators. What unfolded was complete social and reproductive collapse. The male mice stopped competing for mates and territory, and females ceased to nurture and defend their offspring. Over time, these roles became inert. Without any struggle, there was no vitality.

Table 4: Social Bonding and Role Integrity – Mice in Normal vs. Behavioral Sink Conditions

 

This culminated in a class of mice Calhoun called the “beautiful ones,” who spent their time grooming obsessively and avoiding social or sexual behavior entirely. They died not of starvation, but lack of purpose. Those mice represent a form of evolutionary surrender, no longer contributing to the social fabric or reproduction of the colony, despite their physical health.

The analogy to human society becomes apparent when we observe declining cooperation and the rise of solitary behavior in digital culture. The behavioral sink Calhoun identified maps to modern trends: declining birth rates, rising mental illness, reduced physical intimacy, and generalized loss of relational stamina. The drive to create and sustain social bonds is undermined when frictionless digital environments offer the appearance of connection without challenges or consequences.

Just as Calhoun’s mice lost their functional roles in a pressure-free environment, humans are losing theirs in a digitally abundant world that demands little but constant attention. Where there was once a clear, if imperfect, choreography of courtship, child-rearing, and generational identity, there is now ambiguity, contradiction, and apathy. Overstimulation combined with lack of purpose leads away from adaptation to exhaustion and retreat.

Table 5: Behavioral Parallels – Mice in Universe 25 vs. Humans in Digital Ecosystems

 

A crucial insight from Universe 25 is the importance of behavioral feedback loops. Mice, like humans, evolved to respond to cues from their environment and adjust social behavior accordingly. Today, many of the environmental cues that shaped human development, family expectations, communal rituals, apprenticeships, and reciprocal obligation patterns, are being replaced by disembodied digital affirmation and curated performance.

The human need for meaningful contribution, reciprocal relationships, and role differentiation has not vanished, it is being starved of reinforcement. This starvation manifests as behavioral disengagement, as it did in Universe 25. The difference is that humans possess imagination, foresight, and culture. Whether those assets will protect us, or simply make our decline more elaborate, remains uncertain.

III. Demographic Stagnation and the Recline of Reproduction

The modern decline in population growth across advanced economies is frequently mischaracterized as a simple drop in fertility. In truth, it represents a more insidious phenomenon: a cultural and behavioral recline in reproduction. Individuals are not becoming less biologically fertile overnight; rather, they are increasingly opting out of family formation altogether. This shift stems not  only from financial strain or delayed adolescence, but from deeper societal signals which de-incentivize parenting and decouple adult identity from generative roles.

Women are consistently encouraged to prioritize career, autonomy, and self-actualization over relational or familial goals, messages reinforced by dominant narratives in media, education, and popular feminism. While empowering in certain respects, these narratives rarely account for the irreversible decline in female fertility that begins in women’s early 30s and accelerates sharply by their late 30s. For men, the landscape is also socially destabilizing. Traditional signals of male competence, such as the ability to provide, protect, or initiate, are both devalued and actively pathologized as vestiges of patriarchy or toxic masculinity.

Meanwhile, dating platforms have reduced human courtship to gamified algorithms that favor novelty and surface-level attraction over compatibility, effort, or mutual investment. Small subsets of highly attractive users receive the bulk of attention, leaving the majority feeling invisible or irrelevant. For men, especially, this results in a silent crisis of sexual and romantic disenfranchisement. Many conclude, rationally, that the cost of modern dating outweighs the benefits, particularly when cultural narratives no longer reward traditional masculine contributions.

This dynamic contributes to a recursive cycle of withdrawal; fewer stable relationships form, fewer children are born, and fewer examples of intergenerational commitment are visible to the next cohort. Society begins to fracture at its roots, not from physical deprivation, but from a behavioral feedback loop that undermines cooperation, investment, and generativity. In Universe 25, the same loop occured: mating rituals disappeared, mothers stopped tending to their young, and the population plateaued then collapsed. The parallels are not metaphorical, they are mechanistic.

The phenomenon of reproductive decline is thus both demographic and existential. In cultures where reproduction is framed as optional, burdensome, or environmentally harmful, the incentive to be a parent is further weakened. Without intentional cultural scaffolding to affirm the value and meaning of reproduction, biologically fertile individuals deliberately or passively opt out.

In effect, reproduction has become a radical act. And like all radical acts, it now demands conscious choice, cultural support, and behavioral infrastructure that most modern societies are forgetting how to provide.

IV. Feminism, Identity Politics, and Role Displacement

Modern feminism, originally grounded in the pursuit of equal rights and opportunities, has undergone several ideological evolutions, from suffrage to second-wave liberation to third- and fourth-wave identity-driven discourse. Each wave has brought critical advances for women's autonomy and produced complex, often contradictory, outcomes for relational stability, especially in the realms of gender role and romantic partnership.

While early feminism demanded inclusion and equity, contemporary iterations frequently embrace an adversarial stance toward traditional masculinity and role-based interdependence. In its most polarized expressions, feminism equates male agency and initiative with oppression, while it elevates female independence above parental cooperation. The result is a cultural script in which men are framed less as partners and more as potential threats or superfluous sperm donors.

Identity politics, particularly within LGBTQ+ advocacy movements, have also reshaped relational norms. By centering individual identity as the primary locus of social and political value, traditional scripts of courtship, parenting, and communal duty are sidelined in favor of personal narrative and self-expression. While this is empowering for individuals, the shift complicates formation of the shared behavioral roles essential for long-term cooperation and family formation.

Male disengagement is a predictable consequence. As men experience declining incentives to contribute, whether as providers, protectors, or fathers, many retreat into solitude, digital escapism, or ideological backlash. Men's rights movements and online subcultures frequently articulate this crisis as one of dispossession: the loss of social status, romantic visibility, and moral legitimacy. Though sometimes distorted by grievance or misogyny, such voices signal a broader truth: modern society often fails to offer men a positive vision of purpose.

The behavioral sink predicted by Calhoun did not arise from overpopulation, it stemmed from loss of meaningful behavioral roles. Humans, like mice, require feedback systems that reinforce generative behavior. In the absence of cultural structures that valorize reciprocal commitment, sacrifice, and interdependence, individuals default to self-preservation. The paradox is that such preservation ultimately hastens collapse.

Feminism and identity politics, when rooted in antagonism or atomization, risk undermining the social fabric they once sought to reform. A society cannot survive if its citizens are encouraged to distrust or devalue the roles that bind them. The future of gender equity must include both rights and protections,  as well as healthy narratives of cooperation, mutual responsibility, and the nobility of generative labor.

V. Social Media and the Collapse of Authentic Identity

Social media platforms have become central to identity formation, especially among younger generations. Originally designed as tools for connection, social media has evolved into areas of performance, surveillance, and curation. In these environments, individuals are encouraged to manufacture personas optimized for engagement rather than to cultivate stable identities grounded in personal experience, accountability, or social contribution.

Such detachments from authenticity mirror the behavioral patterns of Calhoun’s “beautiful ones.” Those mice, isolated from conflict, challenge, and generative struggle, retreated to compulsive self-grooming and isolation. They became both aesthetically refined and socially obsolete. Likewise, social media encourages users to polish their image while neglecting the relationships and rituals that anchor a coherent sense of self. Social media rewards visibility, not vulnerability, reaction, not reflection.

Young people increasingly report anxiety, loneliness, and identity confusion, because they lack personal connection, and because their digital connections lack depth. Platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat offer constant feedback loops of affirmation and comparison. Such loops disincentivize authenticity. To maintain digital relevance, users must remain hyper-adaptive, shifting their expression to match fleeting trends, group norms, or algorithmic visibility.

This identity volatility is both psychological and ecological. In Universe 25, mice abandoned cooperative roles as environmental overabundance made those roles obsolete. Economically comfortable humans now experience a similar overabundance, both of creature comforts and of identity exposure. Everyone can be seen, judged, rated, and edited. The concept of a private self,  developed in the process of reflective solitude, struggle, and silence, has become an anomaly.

Social media also undermines traditional identity anchors such as family, religion, civic duty, and vocation. Those frameworks are slow, demanding, and resist commodification. In contrast, digital identities are nimble, monetizable, and publicly rewarded. But this flexibility comes at high cost: without stable reference points, a self dissolves into a stream of curated reactions.

The collapse of authentic identity has profound implications for social cohesion. A society composed of fluid avatars cannot sustain the durable trust, sacrifice, and cooperation required for generative culture. The more we perform as entertainers for one another, the less we commit to one another. Like Calhoun’s mice, we risk becoming behavioral ghosts, present but uninvested, connected but alone.

VI. Conceptual Space and the Atrophy of Imagination

In behavioral ecology, survival depends both on material resources and on the capacity to solve problems, imagine alternative outcomes, and form strategies rooted in cooperation and innovation. In Universe 25, as the behavioral sink deepened, mice no longer explored, nested creatively, or engaged in problem-solving behavior. A sterile monotony overtook the colony, in which all novelty vanished, and with it, the motivation to act.

Human society mirrors this collapse through the growing atrophy of conceptual space, the psychological arena where creative, social, and moral imagination takes root. Conceptual space is where humans form dreams, plan futures, negotiate values, and experience a coherent sense of agency. It is shaped by childhood play, intergenerational storytelling, and unstructured time. Increasingly, these building blocks of imagination are crowded out by algorithmic entertainment, prescriptive education, and the gamification of thought.

Digital technologies now dominate attention from infancy through adulthood. Children frequently grow up with little time for solitude or imaginative play, which are central to developing empathy, internal dialogue, and abstract reasoning. Adolescents, meanwhile, find their ideas shaped by online discourse that often rewards outrage, conformity, or binary thinking rather than nuance and exploration. As AI systems increasingly provide instant answers and ready-made frameworks, the incentive to cultivate personal insight, long-form thought, or moral reasoning declines.

Such cognitive and social atrophy extends into adult life. Fewer people read complex publications, engage in sustained civic groups or debate, or participate in generative arts. Cultural production becomes derivative, algorithmically driven, or nostalgic.  Political and ethical discourse frequently lacks enough imagination to envision alternative futures beyond slogans and scripts. The result is cognitive stagnation that parallels the behavioral paralysis of Calhoun’s mice.

Conceptual space is also critical for relation formation. To pursue intimacy, individuals must imagine what love could be, what kind of partner they might become, and how compromise, and give-and-take contributes to something larger than oneself. Without imagination, relationships become transactional, fragile, or avoidant. The breakdown in courtship is both cultural and cognitive.

Restoring conceptual space requires both individual and societal intervention. Individuals must reclaim time for contemplation, creativity, and unstructured thought. Societies must design environments which cultivate exploration, through education reform, media diversity, urban design, and narrative plurality. Without a recovery of imagination, no amount of information or efficiency can prevent collapse. Calhoun’s mice had every need met but could not imagine another way to live. That is the painful warning of the behavioral sink.

VII. AI and  Outsourcing Cognition

Artificial Intelligence represents a powerful new phase in the outsourcing of human cognitive labor. While previous technological innovations automated physical tasks, AI increasingly automates thinking itself, curating decisions, generating ideas, and offering predictive insights. While this may seem like progress, the consequences for behavioral ecology and individual cognitive development will be profound.

In Calhoun’s Universe 25, mice ceased to forage, defend territory, or to parent once the environment made those behaviors unnecessary. Similarly, AI-enabled platforms can remove the need for human beings to perform mental effort: from remembering facts to generating art, solving problems, or writing essays. Over time, such tools can erode what Baumeister termed "the strength model of self-control", the idea that mental stamina, like physical strength, must be exercised to remain resilient.

AI tools such as language models, recommendation systems, and decision engines risk displacing core cognitive behaviors essential to cultural transmission. Humans have historically built culture through storytelling, debate, and group problem-solving. When these processes are outsourced to non-human systems, the feedback loop between effort and insight is broken. Individuals lose the opportunity to form opinions through struggle, to refine plans or arguments over time, and to discover meaning through inquiry.

Sherry Turkle warned in Alone Together that dependence on artificial companionship risks diminishing our ability to tolerate solitude and ambiguity, two key conditions for independent thought. As AI systems become more responsive, more apparently empathic, and more capable of simulating intimacy or intellectual engagement, individuals may find fewer reasons to wrestle with the discomforts of human dialogue or personal reflection.

Cognitively, we are trending toward what Calhoun observed behaviorally: minimal engagement, maximal passivity. The presence of AI may be especially disruptive to educational and developmental trajectories. Students now have instant access to AI-generated answers, summaries, and even emotional advice. While this can enhance access to information, it may also short-circuit the essential developmental processes of questioning, synthesizing, and failing forward.

Furthermore, AI contributes to an illusion of competence. As language models deliver increasingly persuasive output, users may confuse fluency with understanding, and consumption with cognition. The losses in this scenario is both intellectual land existential. Without the friction of thought, individuals become spectators of their own lives, passive recipients of assigned meaning rather than its co-creators.

To preserve the ecological function of cognition, societies must rethink the role of AI in education, media, and everyday life. We must design for augmentation, not replacement, and develop rituals, disciplines, and feedback loops to develop and preserve the fluid and creative value of human thought. In the behavioral sink, the body survived but the spirit collapsed. If we are not vigilant, AI may preserve efficiency while extinguishing agency.

VIII. The Fisherian Runaway Meets the Behavioral Sink: Evolutionary Drift and Social Collapse

The Fisherian runaway is an evolutionary theory proposed by Ronald Fisher, which explains how sexually selected traits can become exaggerated through feedback loops of preference and display. When certain aesthetic or behavioral traits are preferred by one sex, those traits can intensify over generations, even if they reduce overall fitness, because preference and presentation evolve in tandem. Peacocks are a classic example: the elaborate tail persists not because it aids survival, but because it signals attractiveness to peahens.

In the context of modern human society, the Fisherian runaway is increasingly apparent in mate selection dynamics intensified by dating apps, social media, and algorithmic visibility. Traits that are visually stimulating, socially performative, or culturally elevated receive disproportionate attention, leading to the amplification of superficial markers, like attractive facial structure, extreme fitness, curated style, or sexual availability, over substantive ones such as emotional stability, relational fidelity, or parental investment.

Digital platforms foster a marketplace in which short-term mating cues dominate. The feedback loop between visual performance and algorithmic reward results in the prioritization of extremes: hyper-masculine or hyper-feminine traits, radical self-presentation, or overtly curated desirability. As more users adopt these traits to gain social or romantic attention, others must escalate their behavior to compete, producing an evolutionary drift that is decoupled from relational or reproductive success.

This dynamic intersects tragically with the behavioral sink described by Calhoun. Just as mice in Universe 25 began to neglect generative behaviors in favor of grooming and disengagement, humans in the digital mating ecosystem are increasingly opting out of long-term commitment. The result is not a deliberate rejection of family formation but a slow drift toward behaviors that are performative rather than reproductive.

Adding to this feedback loop is the role of endocrine disruption and psychological stress. Environmental toxins, endocrine disrupters (such as those found in plastics), and persistent stressors from economic instability and social fragmentation have all been linked to decreased fertility and libido of both men and women. These physiological changes compound the behavioral drift: even those who desire family formation may struggle with the biological capacity or the psychological stamina to pursue it.

In Universe 25, the mice did not experience sudden collapse, they gradually abandoned the behaviors that sustained life. Mating ceased, maternal behavior vanished, and eventually, birth stopped altogether. A similar sequence is visible today in developed nations. The birthrate does not crash so much as recline, as behavioral and physiological conditions slowly erode the groundwork for generativity.

The implications for social policy and public health are profound. Reproductive endocrinology, behavioral ecology, and technological mediation must be studied together, not in silos. We must recognize that culture, hormones, and environmental cues operate as a single integrated system. Disruption in one domain ripples through all domains.

Without integrative awareness, we risk developing interventions that miss the root causes. Promoting economic incentives for parenting, for example, will fail if psychological exhaustion and hormonal dysregulation make intimacy unbearable. Likewise, advocating for gender equity without reinforcing relational roles and behavioral reciprocity may deepen disengagement rather than resolve it.

To understand the modern risks social collapse, we must view it through both evolutionary and ecological lenses. The Fisherian runaway and the behavioral sink are not opposing models, they are parallel processes, feeding the same outcome: the death of generative culture in a world of overabundant options and collapsed roles.

IX. Death Squared and the New Terms of Extinction

John Calhoun’s use of the phrase “death squared” was not metaphorical, it was diagnostic. In Universe 25, death occurred in two phases: first, as loss of social and behavioral vitality, and second, as the final biological collapse. Behavioral death, the cessation of generative activity, relational investment, and social structure, preceded the physical end. Once the colony ceased to mate, nurture, or engage, the physical death of the population was inevitable.

This bifurcation between behavioral and biological death is now crucial to understanding human decline. Societies may appear demographically viable while being behaviorally inert. Countries like Japan, South Korea, and parts of Western Europe maintain wealth, infrastructure, and healthcare while facing chronic depopulation, youth disengagement, and widespread social withdrawal (e.g., the hikikomori phenomenon).

The first death manifests in indicators such as plummeting marriage rates, record-low birthrates, rising loneliness, and labor force dropout by young adults. Individuals increasingly opt out of relational or civic life, not due to oppression, but due to alienation and lack of existential incentive. Like the beautiful ones in Universe 25, people retreat into curated safety, grooming identities, consuming endlessly, but no longer contributing to generational continuity.

The second death, the irreversible demographic and cultural collapse, follows in lockstep. Without new births, without rites of passage, and without behavioral roles to transmit culture forward, societies erode. Institutions hollow out, cities depopulate, and economies stagnate. A behaviorally disengaged culture loses the very rhythm that makes survival possible.

The paradox is that collapse arises from success. Just as Calhoun’s mice were freed from predators and hunger, modern societies are insulated from many historical threats. It is precisely this insulation that produces the void. Without meaningful struggle or friction, behavioral vitality atrophies. Calhoun showed that death begins not with suffering, but with its absence.

Today, the “new terms of extinction” are behavioral. The metrics are not mass death or visible decay, but subtle patterns of disengagement, childlessness, and identity diffusion. Cultural extinction now occurs not with bombs or famine, but with apathy and abstraction. We scroll, we spectate, we consume, and fewer people imagine themselves as ancestors.

Recognizing this double death is essential for policy, education, and cultural renewal. Without behavioral vitality, no amount of material security will sustain humanity. We must redefine health not only as physical well-being but as ecological participation: the capacity to love, to labor, to imagine, and to reproduce meaning across time.

Extreme Radical Feminism as Social Utopia

Extreme forms of radical feminism, particularly as expressed in popular culture and social media, advocate for a world in which traditional gender roles are not merely optional but are actively dismantled. This includes the rejection of family as a patriarchal institution, the delay or abandonment of motherhood in favor of autonomy and professional success, and cultural emphasis on total independence from male partnership or relational obligation. While these narratives are rooted in the legitimate historical need to challenge coercive gender norms, they can evolve into a kind of ideological utopianism, promising liberation through total detachment from interdependence, reproduction, or traditional social roles.

This vision bears striking resemblance to the findings of John Calhoun’s mouse utopia experiments in the 20th century, in which mice were given abundant resources and experienced total social collapse. The analogy is not perfect, but behavioral parallels raise concerns about the numerous ways removal of structure, purpose, and relational anchoring may affect human communities.

X. Parallels Between Mouse Utopia and Extreme Radical Feminism

As modern behavioral and reproductive roles collapse in high-resource societies, it becomes essential to examine how ideological movements, especially those with utopian aspirations, interact with human behavioral ecology.

Universe 25 illustrated how elimination of struggle, hierarchy, and generative labor can lead to social breakdown, certain cultural narratives may, in pursuit of liberation, inadvertently undermine the behavioral foundations of intimacy, family formation, and cooperative interdependence. Among the most influential of these narratives is contemporary radical feminism, particularly in its more extreme, anti-relational and misandrist expressions. While feminism has played a critical role in securing rights, autonomy, and opportunity for women, its evolving ideology has, in some militant forms, come to view traditional gender roles, parental investment, and heterosexual partnership not as options, but as threats to individual freedom. This shift mirrors, in striking ways, the behavioral drift observed in Calhoun’s mice, where roles dissolved, mating ceased, and purpose gave way to self-isolation. The following section explores these parallels, not to indict feminism, rather to consider how radical individualism, when divorced from behavioral necessity and social reciprocity, may replicate the same ecological collapse observed in the so-called mouse utopia.

Table 6: Mouse Utopia and Cultural Trends Linked to Extreme Feminist Ideology

 


Implications

This parallel is not intended to pathologize feminism, which has been essential in advancing justice and equity. Rather, it addresses the risks of ideological overreach, particularly when the celebration of autonomy morphs into devaluation of human need for intimacy, care, generativity, and belonging. Like the mice who had everything but meaning, modern individuals immersed in radical narratives of liberation may find themselves well-resourced yet emotionally and socially impoverished.

XI. Toward Cultural and Policy Renewal

The collapse witnessed in Universe 25 was not inevitable. It was contingent upon environmental overabundance that eliminated behavioral necessity. Reversing or mitigating this kind of decline in human society demands more than technical solutions, it requires a cultural renaissance rooted in behavioral ecology, psychological meaning, and social investment.

First, policy frameworks must begin to value generative roles not just economically but symbolically. Parenthood, mentorship, civic engagement, and relational labor should be supported through narrative as well as subsidy. Rather than promoting reproduction through economic incentives, societies must develop rituals, institutions, and media that reattach parental identity to care, responsibility, and legacy.

Second, education systems should prioritize conceptual space. Rather than optimizing focusing on test scores and market readiness, education must cultivate imagination, moral reasoning, and cognitive stamina. Programs that support unstructured play, the arts, intergenerational dialogue, and deep reading help preserve the psychological conditions necessary for generativity and resilience.

Third, public discourse should confront the costs of algorithmic culture head-on. Platforms must be held accountable for their role in shaping social and mating dynamics, political fragmentation, and mental health crises. Regulation of social media platforms should target not just data privacy and misinformation, but the behavioral design that maximizes profits at the expense of coherence and cohesion.

Fourth, masculinity and femininity must be reimagined not as antagonistic forces but as complementary energies. We must offer both men and women stories of value that dignify sacrifice, honor interdependence, and celebrate mutual aid. Feminism must return to its humanistic core: the full flourishing of people in community, not the supremacy of autonomy at all costs.

Fifth, interdisciplinary research must integrate behavioral ecology, endocrinology, and digital sociology. Policymakers, urban designers, educators, and technologists must work together to understand how human environments shape not only behavior but meaning making. The health of future generations depends on restoring behavioral opportunities, structures that reward real-world cooperation, creative struggle, and reproductive continuity.

Last, we must resist the temptation to fully outsource our cognition, identity, or purpose to machines. AI can augment our capacities, but it cannot substitute for moral growth, social bonding, or the friction that makes maturity possible. Human dignity is not found in ease but in the meaningful challenge of becoming who we are, together.

Cultural renewal begins not with mass movements but with small, durable reinvestments: in family, in faith, in friendship, in craft. Like Calhoun’s mice, we stand at the precipice of behavioral extinction, not because we suffer, but because we no longer need to act. The only way back is through the rediscovery of action itself.

XII. The Future Role of Psychologists and Counselors: Maintaining and Rebuilding Generative Culture

With AI increasingly managing cognitive tasks, digital platforms gamifying courtship, and virtual identities displacing embodied, reciprocal interaction, human society faces a growing risk of psychological saturation—a state in which minds are inundated with stimuli but deprived of meaningful engagement. Simultaneously, foundational relational behaviors such as courting, bonding, marriage, parenting, and long-term partnership are becoming behaviorally atrophied. As the social, emotional, and cultural environments that once nurtured and reinforced these behaviors erode, they are no longer practiced, expected, or rewarded; leading not only to individual disconnection, but to the quiet collapse of the generative structures that sustain human society.

As traditional pathways for courtship, bonding, marriage, parenting, and long-term partnership weaken, psychologists and counselors will face a defining professional and ethical challenge: how to respond to a slow-motion erosion of relational life that is not driven by trauma or crisis, but by abundance, substitution, and behavioral redundancy.

In this emerging landscape, mental health professionals will be called to do more than treat disorders—they must help maintain and rebuild the ecological scaffolding for human connection across generations.

1. From Symptom Reduction to Cultural Restoration

Historically, therapists have focused on individual distress, interpersonal conflict, or psychopathology. But increasingly, clients are presenting not with pathology in the traditional sense, but with existential drift, social alienation, and relationship fatigue. These are not symptoms of disorder, but of disconnection from generative roles—the very behaviors that once gave structure and meaning to human life.

Mental Health Professionals will need to:

  • Frame relational decline as ecological and behavioral, not just individual or moral

  • Normalize conversations about loss of purpose, ritual, and identity in a post-courtship society

  • Help clients reconstruct new behavioral scripts for intimacy, caregiving, and long-term bonding

2. Role Development in the Absence of Tradition

As cultural institutions (religion, family, gender roles) recede or evolve, psychologists can play a key role in helping individuals co-create new roles:

  • Supporting men and women in navigating fluid expectations around gender, caregiving, and partnership

  • Helping clients develop intentional life narratives that integrate modern autonomy with ancient needs for belonging and purpose

  • Offering models of functional relationships in environments where clients may have little exposure to them

3. Therapy as a Relational Microculture

Therapeutic settings may become one of the last structured spaces where individuals experience:

  • Attuned listening

  • Secure emotional connection

  • Respectful challenge

  • Rehearsal of vulnerable conversation

In that sense, the therapy room becomes a living laboratory—not only for healing trauma, but for reintroducing behavioral patterns that society no longer reliably teaches or supports.

4. Community-Level Interventions

Mental Health Professionals can also lead broader efforts to restore social capital and relational infrastructure:

  • Designing interventions that strengthen community attachment

  • Promoting mentorship, intergenerational bonds, and parental readiness

  • Collaborating with educators, urban planners, and public health officials to rebuild environments that reward cooperative and generative behavior

5. Ethical Imperatives in a Post-Ritual Society

This shift carries ethical weight. If we know that relational erosion contributes to behavioral collapse, then restoring generative behavior becomes a public good, not just a private service. Mental health professionals must:

  • Advocate for policies and environments that promote long-term relationships and caregiving

  • Challenge overly individualistic or performative cultural narratives

  • Engage in preventive work that strengthens relational capacity before crisis emerges

The psychologist and counselor of the future will be more than a healer of distress. They must become a guide, a cultural architect, and a behavioral ecologist, helping individuals and communities rediscover the roles, rituals, and relationships that allow human beings not just to survive, but to connect, contribute, and flourish.

 References

  1. Calhoun, J. B. (1973). "Death Squared: The Explosive Growth and Demise of a Mouse Population." Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 66(1), 80–88.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1644264/

  2. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
    https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/sherry-turkle/alone-together/9780465093656/

  3. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy--and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. New York: Atria Books.
    https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/iGen/Jean-M-Twenge/9781501151989

  4. Turchin, P. (2016). Ages of Discord: A Structural-Demographic Analysis of American History. Chaplin, CT: Beresta Books.
    https://peterturchin.com/book/ages-of-discord/

  5. Young, K. S. (1998). "Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder." CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237–244.
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237

  6. Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
    https:www.//righteousmind.com/

  7. Klotz, A. (2022). Why We Quit: The Great Resignation and the Culture of Work. Harvard Business Review Press.
    https://hbr.org/2022/06/the-great-resignation-stems-from-a-great-exploration

Related Articles

Key words: Supervisor Education, Ethical Charting, CareOregon’s New Barrier to Oregon’s Mental Health Services, Mental Health, Psychotherapy, Counseling, Ethical and Lawful Value Based Care,